The
patient is in control. My
fancy policy-manual term
for this is: "autonomous
decision-making at the end-of-life."
What it means is: "Whose
death is this anyway?"
It reminds us to ask, even
in prison: "How does
this inmate want to die?"
In the community, the patient
is in his home territory.
Even when we don't agree
with his decisions, even
when he won't agree to our
aggressive symptom-control
measures, the hospice team
ultimately defers to him.
But if the prison administration
has not settled the question
of whose death it is, you
don't have hospice care.
You may have good nursing
care and meet the need for
basic comfort, but it is
not hospice care.
But--the
inmate in control? Really?
Isn't that a bit dangerous?
If we start with that, aren't
we headed down that well-known
slippery slope?
Hospice
care was designed to meet
not just physical needs,
but the needs of the whole
person. Pain is not just
physical; pain can be of
the emotions and of the
spirit. Early on it was
recognized that a team effort
provided the best way of
responding to all of these
needs. So doctors, nurses,
social workers, and chaplains
all play a role.
In a prison, what do you
do about security personnel?
Are they included in the
multi-disciplinary team?
If security isn't behind
the concept, the program
is sunk. Security controls
inmate movement, security
controls the degree of interaction
between inmates, security
controls inmate property.
The inclusion of security
in the multidisciplinary
team and a recognition of
their contribution are necessary
for a viable program.
The patient and family are
the unit of care. In community
hospice training we caution
team members to be sensitive
to who is "family":
cousins? neighbors? friends?
Operating a hospice in the
prison setting requires
a similar redefinition of
family. Who is family: other
inmates? staff? outside
family?
Volunteers
are the heart of hospice. The modern hospice movement
was founded by volunteers.
The respite, the friendship,
the caring that volunteers
give had never been provided
within the framework of
any health care delivery
system. Volunteers are so
essential, so vital, so
hospice, that the use of
volunteers was actually
written into federal and
state Medicare regulations.
They are everyday people
who make a commitment to
care for vulnerable others.
I close my eyes and listen:
the words of encouragement
and understanding and the
search for self-knowledge
that I hear from the inmate
volunteers are the same
words I heard on the outside
during my seventeen years
training community volunteers.
When I open my eyes, I am
surrounded by eight murderers,
two armed robbers, one sex
offender, and two men who
solicited for murder. The
chance to volunteer, the
chance to succeed, the chance
to atone, the chance to
be good are so much more
important in the prison
setting.
Know
who your patient is. On the outside we mean that
sometimes the person needing
support is not the person
dying, but a family member.
In prison, I would change
it to "Know who is
benefiting from hospice
care." Sometimes it's
the inmate volunteer! Sometimes
their motives for volunteering
may be complicated, but
none of them have left the
experience unchanged.
The
basic concepts of a prison
hospice are the same as
those for a community hospice.
The differences are only
procedural. How will you
train volunteers? How will
you allow inmates' movement?
To what degree do you allow
special circumstances to
supersede segregation time?
To what extent do you change
rules for visits by the
family? How do you give
inmates control of their
own care? And how do you
define your team? Each prison
system should have the freedom
to answer these questions
in their own way. But if
you forget the concepts
of pain control, patient
autonomy, multi-disciplinary
team, patient and family
as unit of care, volunteer--you
can call your program comfort
care, but don't call it
hospice.
Inmates, like patients in
the community, shy away
from a program that confronts
them with the fact that
they are dying. As a result,
the current length of stay
in community hospices is
much less than the six months
mandated by Medicare--fewer
than thirty days, according
to my sources on the streets.
To confront dying is a major
life step, regardless of
where one is living.
I encountered some surprises
in working with inmate patients,
some of which have been
mentioned in the few articles
that have appeared about
prison hospices. My experiences
confirm what others have
reported. And I have a few
observations of my own to
add.
Inmates
are hesitant to come into
the hospice program for
several reasons:
If an inmate accepts that
his condition is terminal,
he doesn't want to die in
prison. Nothing signifies
defeat as much as dying
in prison. Inmates want
to prolong curative treatment
if it offers just a couple
more months of life, because
"Man, I've only got
six more months...a year...eighteen
months to do!"
Inmates do not trust correctional
medical care in general,
and the hospice program
falls under that umbrella.
They perceive it as "the
State's attempt to deny
us life-saving and expensive
care."
Hospice acknowledges the
patient's vulnerability,
but inmates cannot afford
to appear weak and needy.
They are fearful of being
exploited, of losing their
macho image: "I don't
need anyone to hold my hand!"
I was surprised to see that
inmates can be non-compliant
with pain medication. Some
people expect to see drug-seeking
behavior; instead I see
drug "stoicism."
Until the very end, some
inmates are fearful of being
perceived as not alert to
their environment. And inmates
distrust other inmates,
even if they are hospice
volunteers. They feel the
volunteers will use what
they learn to hurt the patient
or his outside family.
And
I have learned this: caring
still matters. I may not
be able to establish rapport
and trust as quickly as
I did working with the people
in my rural white community,
but it is still possible.
Everyone on the hospice
team has to make the basic
commitment: we are starting
from square one; all judgments
need to be suspended. It
doesn't matter what the
inmate did to bring him
to prison. It doesn't even
matter what kind of person
he is now. The prison hospice
makes the leap of faith:
it doesn't matter! This
suspension of judgment means
providing good care regardless
of background. You don't
have to like each inmate,
but you are obligated to
provide good care.
For
dealing with the difficult
psychological dynamics such
as anger and paranoia, I
have no easy answers. I
recognize that anger is
only a mask for fear; if
I identify the fears, I
can start to address them.
Ultimately,
my aim is that the inmate
know that here is a group
of people who are not going
to walk away. To a person
who knows that the hospice
team is all he has, I can
make one promise: you will
not be alone.
Finally, some observations
about the care and feeding
of inmate volunteers. I
am X-Files fan. Those of
you who are likewise both
X-Files fans and correctional
workers can relate with
the statement: "Trust
no one." But the use
of inmate volunteers requires
that we "trust someone."
In fact, we have built a
program that requires that
we trust inmates. Sometimes
it scares me because I know
the day will come when one
of them fails the program,
and the program will suffer.
At Dixon we are trying to
protect against this the
best way we know how. Most
of the measures are double-sided:
they protect the system,
but the inmate volunteers
also benefit.
Volunteers must pass an
extensive vote sheet that
requires approval by the
hospice coordinator, the
counselor, security, and
all three levels of wardens.
The vote sheets are not
even circulated if there
has been a rule infraction
in the last six months.
From day one, either in
pre-training interviews
or on the first day of training,
the volunteers' responsibility
as pioneers is emphasized:
they are special, they were
chosen. But with that comes
responsibility. One rule
infraction will result in
suspension or removal from
the program. The program
can't afford jerks.
The training is deliberately
long--fourteen weeks. The
inmate's responses in class,
his attitude, his demeanor
will help to confirm what
his intentions really are.
Some of the interactions
during training also assist
the inmate in questioning
himself, finding out what
is hard for him, probing
his own inner experiences,
knowing how those experiences
will influence his caring.
The leaders will later make
pairings of volunteer and
patient based on these strengths
and weaknesses.
The volunteer pool should
be limited to a manageable
number. Someone has to know
everything that is going
on within the program. Someone
has to know who is doing
what with whom and whether
it is within the assignment.
The prison is too often
a place of subterfuge. If
the coordinator loses contact,
the program becomes a joke.
The volunteers must receive
the respect they deserve. Let them know that they
are an important part of
the team, that their opinion
and experiences matter.
At monthly volunteer conferences,
each active volunteer can
relate his experiences and
the others can learn from
them. The volunteer should
be cloaked in the satisfaction
of knowing his work is important.
Take pride in your group. They are facing a challenge
of the spirit, so let them
soar. Let their atonement
speak for itself.