| |
Interview with Florence Wald, Part Two |
Jane Kolleeny: In a prison hospice program,
in addition to the medical staff, there are hospice
volunteers among the inmates. What do you think about
inmate volunteers in terms of the fact that they might
have a violent background? Do you think a hospice volunteer
program might have some rehabilitative qualities?
Florence Wald: Any volunteer who‰s helping someone
else, having the experience of doing something kind
or helpful for another person raises self-value, self-image.
As they are doing it for that person they are also doing
it for themselves.
K: Which is a wonderful thing. However, there is
a strong attitude in our society regarding people who
are in prison: these people have committed crimes against
society and they are in prison to be punished. Why should
we care about their well-being? Our tax dollars pay
for educating them. Why should we let them have fitness
rooms where they can work out? Why should we support
a hospice program? Who cares about these people?
Henry Wald: That‰s one school of thinking,
and they say it‰s costing more to keep inmates where
they are than to find some way to bring them back into
society.
W: I am not an expert on violence and how
it erupts. But I see the growing number of poor people
living in decaying city neighborhoods alienated from
those who have been able to support themselves. They
are isolated with little opportunity to lead a productive
life. Look at their place in society. Go through Harlem,
New Haven or Hartford. If we had to live in conditions
like these, what would it feel like? I‰m in a car, and
I can go. They don't have a car.
K: State by state, legislation determines the policies
regarding discharging prisoners when they're terminal.
Some can be discharged to their families, and some can
be discharged to a local hospice or hospital, if they
committed a lesser crime. If they are a murderer, they
won‰t be discharged. Do you have any comments on that?
W: It is important to know what these people are
going through while they are in prisons, their experiences
of being terminally ill. Information from the volunteers,
what problems they have encountered, is also important.
I think we can learn a tremendous amount from prison
hospices.
NZ: Do you think our society is open and willing
for prison hospice programs where prisoners are specially
treated?
K: There are free-standing prison hospices already
where prisoners who are discharged are taken care of.
There are also hospice programs within the prison walls.
For a prisoner who is dying, there might be tremendous
regret or renunciation, or maybe anger, discontentment
and unwillingness to accept, bitterness. Those things
that happen when you're dying anyway would be exaggerated
among prisoners. For volunteer inmates to observe and
support that effort is interesting to think about, and
hospice training becomes important.
W: Training and supporting. But listening comes
first.
K: It would not cost tax-payers money for inmate
volunteers to help terminal patients. It would also
have rehabilitative qualities for the inmate volunteers
as well as helping people who are dying. It seems overall
a good thing to do.
W: - - Economically.
K: - - And psychologically. According to the
media, relatives of murder victims usually want vengeance.
If they can punish someone who has committed a crime,
that will alleviate their suffering. For example, if
they can punish the killer of their daughter, put the
killer away, that will be a new beginning for them.
That‰s the only way they can achieve some sort of peace;
it‰s an-eye-for-an-eye kind of attitude.
NZ: But on the other hand, doesn‰t frgiveness rehabilitate
both the victim and the perpetrator?
W: We know forgiveness is necessary for people on
the outside, and there is less opportunity in prison
for that forgiveness to take place. It is important
to allow for that healing, for the patient and other
people.
K: What is it like to sit with someone who is dying?
What kind of support do you provide? Is it just being
there?
W: There are many variables. For example, physiologic
crisis. If a patient has respiratory distress it can
be very scary for the patient and family. But when dying
is on a smooth trajectory, it is not frightening. Some
patients are conscious and want to communicate up to
the last minute. Of course, the trajectory depends on
how patient and family are communicating, how much they've
been able to discuss and whether they are at the same
point of ability to let go. A good sense of humor helps.
I admire the nurses who, through music or a phrase,
can get a whole group of people - patients, families,
nurses - into a dialogue. It's a constant dance, in
a way, of getting a sense of what's going on and then
taking risks. There are these wonderful things, the
"hospice moments" where everyone is working
together, the staff, the patients, the family. They
know what they are trying to accomplish, and not only
get over an obstacle, but leap over it. It's a collective
experience. Exactly what makes it work, I don't know.
But it's powerful when you see it.
K: People are tentative and fearful about being
around someone who's dying.
W: That takes experience and the important part
of the training is to make the person who is the helper
confident that they can do it. You‰ll have bad experiences
too, where things don't go right, everybody tries and
it just doesn't come off.
K: With regard to what some might call delusional
behavior, or thought patterns among the dying, can you
comment on that?
W: If you don't quite get what the patient is talking
about, you try to figure it out. As the patient comes
closer to death, they are often beginning to think in
terms of an afterlife. They are either remembering or
actually seeing, certainly they believe they are seeing,
people important in their lives who have already died.
There is a lot of data being collected now on that whole
division between life and death. People are looking
at it. When Elisabeth Kubler-Ross first talked about
it, everybody said she had gone off her nut. But with
experience, people are more respectful of the possibility
that there's only so far we can go. The rest has to
be experienced by people who are on the point of death.
In our own experience of what we see, each of us has
a different end point. My own, for example, is the realization
that breathing stops but the presence of that individual
is still in the room. Such a presence can last as long
as a few days.
K: Do you think a patient who's dying goes in and
out of the experience of death?
W: Yes, I do.
W: I think that happens. The same thing can happen
if you go through any kind of crisis. When it's death
people have gone through, it is even more compelling.
In terms of prison hospices, I am concerned about the
size of the group, both patients and volunteers, and
that we know how vast their experience is and how it
is dealt with. They are a part of the total population,
mostly disenfranchised peoples, which our health care
system knows little about. The development of prison
hospice care may only come through volunteer groups
within and outside of prisons being in contact with
one another. We have much to offer and much to learn
from those who die in prison and those who help them.
It is a disenfranchised population. We need to know
if we can help healing to take place. Can fellow prisoners
surpass prison staff and non-prison volunteers in understanding
and support?
|
|
|